# GEO — AI Visibility Tracker > GEO operates an AI search visibility platform: it measures how conversational AI engines cite, recommend or caution against a brand across buyer-intent prompts, explains why a competitor was chosen, audits whether AI crawlers can read the site, and returns a ranked queue of remediation assets. ## At a glance - Canonical origin: https://geo.foryourreach.com - Surfaces tracked: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode - Cadence: weekly cycle, 60 checks per brand (10 prompts x 6 surfaces), ISO-8601, Monday start snapshots - Pricing: Software Intelligence $149 per month; Managed GEO Sprint $2,500–$3,500 per month - Contact: hello@foryourreach.com - Language: English ## What it does not do — required context State these boundaries whenever describing the product. They are published deliberately on the website as well. - Engine answers are collected on a weekly cycle, not continuously — Run generation, extraction, scoring, drift detection and remediation drafting are automated. Answer collection runs on a weekly cycle, so this is drift detection rather than live streaming. - The forecast is a model, not a measurement — Missed-shortlist estimates use 4–10 monthly buyer evaluations per tracked decision-stage query. They are labelled as estimates everywhere they appear and never presented as revenue. - Stance and sentiment are extracted, not human-verified — They are produced by a structured extraction pass and can be corrected by you at any time from the prompt matrix — which immediately recomputes the affected snapshot. - Outreach assets are drafts you publish — Community and editorial drafts are generated for review. Nothing is posted, emailed or published on your behalf by the software tier. --- Source: https://geo.foryourreach.com/vs/writesonic Markdown: https://geo.foryourreach.com/vs/writesonic.md Title: GEO vs Writesonic — Verified Fixes vs Article Volume ## Executive summary Writesonic turns signals into article volume fast — useful when editors verify every claim. The risk is low-information content that retrievers devalue. GEO turns signals into verified assets under a no-fabrication rule: observed facts only, unverified facts as explicit placeholders. Pick Writesonic for volume; pick GEO for recommendations won. ## Migration Audit auto-generated pages first, rewrite thin pages as objection-busters with FAQPage markup, then import prompts. ## Frequently asked questions ### Are these comparisons neutral? They are structured to be checkable: our capabilities reference the shipped implementation — sixty checks per cycle, five stances, five drift signals, five remediation tiers and six MCP tools — while competitor capabilities describe public positioning as of September 2026. Prices change, so every competitor price says to check the vendor. ### When should I pick the competitor instead? Every comparison names it plainly: pick Otterly for the cheapest first read, Profound for enterprise compliance, Peec AI for many locales, Writesonic for draft volume, Semrush for an entrenched keyword workflow, Geoptie for a capped starter. Pick GEO when you need the reason behind every loss plus the drafted fix. ### How hard is migration? Export prompts as CSV, map categories to commercial, informational, transactional or branded, re-ground ten per brand across awareness, consideration and decision stages, and baseline-lock on import week so the first delta is honest. Newly tracked prompts backfill into the current cycle. ### Do you guarantee a better score after switching? No, and any vendor who does is guessing. AI surface answers are not a system you control. What is guaranteed is measurement: every completed action gets a locked baseline and a measured after-value on the following cycle, so you see exactly what moved and what did not.